Search:

 


                       

   

Immigration

Since 1997, our firm has represented individuals in business-based non-immigrant and immigrant visa petitions - - Non-Immigrant Worker Visa Petitions (H1B1); Intra-company Transferee Visa Petitions (L1); Extraordinary Ability Alien Visa Petitions (O1); Applications for Alien Employment Certification (ETA 9089); and, Immigrant Worker Petitions (I-140).   Additionally, we filed various family-based immigration petitions, including Alien Relative Petitions (I-130); Applications for the Removal of one´s Conditional Residence (I-751); Applications for Alien Fiancé Visa (I-129F) and others.

Of course, in order to enable the client to obtain his/her "dream" of becoming a Lawful Permanent Resident, we have filed many Applications for Adjustment of Status (I-485) and subsequently appeared with the client at his/her Adjustment of Status interview.

Needless to say, some cases present extremely difficult "hurdles" that one must pass in order to obtain the desired result.  Examples of such issues include a person´s criminal conviction prior to applying for Adjustment of Status, which can lead to the denial of his application; an individual that stands convicted of a crime after obtaining the status of Lawful Permanent Resident can lose his/her lawful immigration status in the United States; a client´s separation and/or divorce from a U.S. Citizen spouse prior to the two (2) year deadline of his/her marriage-based Conditional Residence can lead the USCIS to seek that person´s Removal from the United States; and, a client´s misrepresentation to a U.S. Consular Officer at the time his/her Visa to the United States was issued can lead to the denial of that person´s future application for an immigration benefit.    These examples represent some, but certainly not all, of the significant challenges that a person may face in order to obtain, or keep his/her lawful immigration status in the United States.

Over the years, we filed many waiver applications for individuals who find themselves in the circumstances described above, as well as many other difficult legal situations that our clients had faced.  In so doing, we efficiently and zealously presented the merits of our client´s cases to the USCIS, as well as the Immigration Courts of the United States.

In many instances, we represented clients, who were placed in Removal (i.e. deportation) Proceedings before an Immigration Judge and sought relief from Removal such as, Asylum; Cancellation of Removal for Permanent Residents, as well as for Non-Permanent Residents; NACARA-based Suspension of Deportation; and Adjustment of Status. 

Yet, our firm´s representation of a client´s interest in an immigration matter does not end at the agency (i.e. USCIS) level, or hearing (i.e. Immigration Court) level.  Where necessary and applicable, we have appealed a client´s case to the Board of Immigration Appeals. 

Additionally, our immigration practice also enables our clients to seek relief before the Federal Courts.  We file clients´ appeals with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  Such filings are relatively complicated, and include the preparation of a detailed Brief, as well as a Joint Appendix.   We also prepare and file Actions for Mandamus Relief and Petitions for Hearing on Naturalization Applications with the United States District Court ¯ Southern District of New York; Eastern District of New York; and, the District of New Jersey.   In such matters, we have repeatedly compelled the USCIS to act on a client´s application and/or grant a client the relief to which he/she are entitled. 

 
   
5 5 55
 

Contact Us     |      Disclaimer     |     Secure Web Site               2010 Popescu & Iosepovici